When it's time for your baby to sleep, do you set him down on his back? If so, you've taken a crucial step toward protecting his health and safety. That's because putting babies sunny-side up for naps and nighty-night helps protect them from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). In fact, in the nine years since experts first began urging parents to put their newborns "back to sleep," the number of SIDS cases has fallen by more than half.
Still, this dreaded syndrome -- in which a child between 1 month and 1 year of age suddenly dies for no apparent reason, usually in her sleep -- remains an all-too-real threat. It's the leading killer of babies more than a month old, striking more than one in every 2,000 infants, according to statistics from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). And while certain groups of babies seem to be especially vulnerable -- SIDS strikes slightly more boys than girls, and two-and-a-half times more African-American babies than white ones -- the causes are still a mystery. Even experts can't predict which newborns will become victims.
But that doesn't mean parents are powerless against it. There are plenty of ways to protect your little one from SIDS, above and beyond tiptoeing into his nursery every night to watch each gentle rise and fall of his tiny chest (although you'll probably do that anyway). Parents interviewed leading experts and researchers around the country to get their lifesaving advice. Take these measures today, and you -- and your baby -- will sleep better tonight.
What do you think of this story? Tell Us.
Please confirm your comment by answering the question below and clicking "Submit Comment."
Sometimes I wonder if the SIDS awareness media is some sort of propaganda. Finally, SIDS is not supposed to be the same as soffocation. It's supposed to be what they label an unexplained death, the cause of which an autopsy can't identify. I was under the impression that an autopsy is fully capable of determining suffocation as cause of death. I have also read that SIDS is not the same as suffocation. So why are suggestions to allow adequate oxygen supply always in SIDS articles. SO confused.
1/29/2012 11:51:50 PM Report Abuse"2 1/2-year study. 500 infants. no pacifiers 3X more likely to die of SIDS." How could they possibly know that they were more likely to die if none out of the 500 died. SIDS is not prevalent enough for a 500 count experiment (esp. over a 2 and a half year study) to be literal in it's accuracy. I can't see this source being reliable. Infants were obviously being monitored. Researchers/parents would intervene at any chance of a complication or risk. just don't get it.
1/29/2012 11:51:19 PM Report Abuse